data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db1ab/db1ab1fb617f7cc6d9f82369a743e93b4ef1369e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1fd8/e1fd88ff96dc6c770600113bdc6b469bcc10d8e0" alt="$ M_1 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ed89/8ed897176a7e9dd65eba3c135aca6b1714a39f22" alt="$ M_2 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a07ef/a07ef1d55cc5a84818dad49ffcbb1aed95a0b046" alt="$ M_1 \cap M_2 $"
Let be a bridgeless cubic graph. A binary cycle (henceforth called cycle) is a set
so that every vertex of
has even degree (equivalently, a cycle is any member of the binary cycle space). A postman join is a set
so that
is a cycle. Note that since
is cubic, every perfect matching is a postman join. Next we state a well-known theorem of Jaeger in three equivalent forms.
- \item
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caf28/caf28e7cb5c9ab2f126585be9a0805256a629eaf" alt="$ {\mathbb Z}_2^3 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24ea1/24ea1f788ccdda1f82bed0205ddd4caf5e379be5" alt="$ C_1,C_2,C_3 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40099/4009977d045684d31b7d8a34e78558da695e51ac" alt="$ C_1 \cup C_2 \cup C_3 = E $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8304f/8304f02dc3820d7999fa1f045e2ad0ee61662ae0" alt="$ J_1,J_2,J_3 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61db2/61db2fd85f8ee9a0e8361ddebd2773a2fb102a05" alt="$ J_1 \cap J_2 \cap J_3 = \emptyset $"
The last of these statements is interesting, since The Berge Fulkerson Conjecture (if true) implies the following:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b514/3b5142009dd7f55fe3d2cd6715c93337d9a99fcd" alt="$ M_1,M_2,M_3 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfa07/bfa07f1ba748a59ea13d5da61d267c3e6205f78b" alt="$ M_1 \cap M_2 \cap M_3= \emptyset $"
So, we know that has three postman joins
with empty intersection, and it is conjectured that
may be chosen so that each is a perfect matching, but now we see two statements in between the theorem and the conjecture. Namely, is it true that
may be chosen so that one is a perfect matching? or two? The first of these was solved recently.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5b06/a5b060710c15b3eb12d95b45b0bad447bd1c7825" alt="$ J_1,J_2 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb23f/fb23f5e9a6e7f439dbea6957514fa56b37dd37a9" alt="$ M $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d5f/05d5f32602ae2bdd445e924546bb7385b81ae3f1" alt="$ M \cap J_1 \cap J_2 = \emptyset $"
The second of these asks for two perfect matchings and one postman join
so that
. It is an easy exercise to show that a set
contains a postman join if an only if
has nonempty intersection with every odd edge-cut. Therefore, finding two perfect matchings and one postman join with empty common intersection is precisely equivalent to the conjecture at the start of this page - find two perfect matchings whose intersection contains no odd edge-cut.
Bibliography
* Edita Macajova, Martin Skoviera, Fano colourings of cubic graphs and the Fulkerson conjecture. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 349 (2005), no. 1, 112--120. MathSciNet
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.