This conjecture is clearly tight, because in a decomposition of a directed graph in directed paths, at least directed paths must start at vertex .
Observe that the analogue is trivially false for odd tournament: in regular tournament for every vertex , so . For a tournament of even order , . Since a directed path may have up to arcs, it might be possible to cover the arcs of the tournament if is even. If the tournament is almost regular (i.e. for all vertex ), the conjecture asserts that it can be decomposed into directed Hamilton paths.
This conjecture for almost regular tournaments would imply the following one due to Kelly.
To see this, consider a regular tournament and a vertex of . The tournament has even order, and in , unless is an outneighbour of in in which case . Hence . Now if Alspach-Mason-Pulman conjecture holds, can be decomposed into directed paths. These paths must start at distinct outneighbours of in and ends at distinct inneighbours of in . Hence, we can complete each directed path in a Hamilton directed cycle in to obtain a decomposition of into Hamilton cycles.
Kelly's conjecture has been proved for tournaments of sufficiently large order by Kühn and Osthus [KO].
Bibliography
*[AMP] Brian Alspach, David W. Mason, Norman J. Pullman, Path numbers of tournaments, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 20 (1976), no. 3, June 1976, 222–228
[KO] Daniela Kühn and Deryk Osthus, Hamilton decompositions of regular expanders: a proof of Kelly's conjecture for large tournaments, Advances in Mathematics 237 (2013), 62-146.
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.