data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db1ab/db1ab1fb617f7cc6d9f82369a743e93b4ef1369e" alt=""
Vertex Cover Integrality Gap
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a464/9a464a260925dd1906faecdd0c3abea19854b0c7" alt="$ \varepsilon > 0 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b96e3/b96e36b53fcd0be1c842d9cc65c1213d16d906f0" alt="$ \delta > 0 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7016/f70163974908447a07f819cb0b84ca126a2b13aa" alt="$ n $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7016/f70163974908447a07f819cb0b84ca126a2b13aa" alt="$ n $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/463b5/463b588d4c40067b99d8b14424650da5835be4e4" alt="$ H $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96123/9612359ee2f69fa6f21b9875a36188d7d6779db2" alt="$ G \equiv_{\delta n}^{\mathrm{C}} H $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45065/45065fad63ac63e2af716c8e98eb8e3b3ded5c47" alt="$ \mathrm{vc}(G) \ge (2 - \varepsilon) \cdot \mathrm{vc}(H) $"
Here denotes indistinguishability in
-variable first-order logic with counting quantifiers, and
denotes the cardinality of the minimum vertex-cover of
. By~[1],
implies
. Also by~[1] a positive answer would imply that an integrality gap of
resists
levels of Sherali-Adams linear programming relaxations of vertex-cover, on
-vertex graphs. It is known that such a gap resists
levels~[2]. What we ask would let us replace
by
. If improving over
were not possible, then we could approximate vertex-cover by a factor better than~
in subexponential time (i.e.
). Approximating vertex-cover by a factor better than~1.36 is NP-hard~[3], and approximating vertex-cover by factor better than~2 is UG-hard~[4], where UG stands for Unique Games (from the Unique Games Conjecture); but note that UG-hardness does not rule out subexponential-time algorithms because UG itself is solvable in subexponential time~[5]
Bibliography
[1] A. Atserias and E. Maneva. Sherali-Adams Relaxations and Indistinguishability in Counting Logics, in Proc. 3rd ACM ITCS, pp. 367-379, 2012.
[2] M. Charikar, K. Makarychev and Y. Makarychev. Integrality Gaps for Sherali-Adams Relaxations, in Proc. 41st ACM STOC, pp. 283-292, 2009.
[3] I. Dinur and S. Safra. On the Hardness of Approximating Minimum Vertex-Cover, Annals of Mathematics, 162(1):439-485, 2005.
[4] S. Khot and O. Regev. Vertex cover might be hard to approximate to within 2-epsilon, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 74(3):335-349, 2008.
[5] S. Arora, B. Barak, and D. Steurer. Subexponential Algorithms for Unique Games and Related problems, in Proc. 51th IEEE FOCS, pp. 563-572, 2010.}
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.