Jones' conjecture
For a graph , let denote the cardinality of a maximum cycle packing (collection of vertex disjoint cycles) and let denote the cardinality of a minimum feedback vertex set (set of vertices so that is acyclic).
In [KLL], the authors mention that there exists a family of nonplanar graphs for which , so no such result could hold for general graphs. They also point out that the conjecture is tight for wheels, and they prove it for the special case of outerplanar graphs.
Bibliography
*[KLL] Ton Kloks, Chuan-Min Lee, and Jiping Liu, New Algorithms for -Face Cover, -Feedback Vertex Set, and -Disjoint Cycles on Plane and Planar Graphs, in Proceedings of the 28th International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG2002), LNCS 2573, pp. 282--295, 2002.
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.
Why Jones'?
Does anyone know why this is called Jones' Conjecture?
Reply: Why Jones'?
I am Jones. My Taiwanese name is Chuan-Min Lee. This conjecture came up when I was working on it with Ton Kloks and Jiping Liu. I used the name "Jones" instead of my Taiwanese name for ease of communication.
Proved for subcubic planar
Proved for subcubic planar graphs by Marthe Bonamy, François Dross, Tomáš Masařík, Wojciech Nadara, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michał Pilipczuk [https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.01570].