data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db1ab/db1ab1fb617f7cc6d9f82369a743e93b4ef1369e" alt=""
For any simple digraph , we let
be the number of unordered pairs of nonadjacent vertices (i.e. the number of non-edges), and
be the size of the smallest feedback edge set.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7b83/e7b83b1d558b723001edceba8e10f55d1ff95c6b" alt="$ \le 3 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3754/f3754e8b467c1ae2fed02fa32b112afe5795cede" alt="$ \beta(G) \le \frac{1}{2} \gamma(G) $"
If satisfies
, then
is a tournament, and it is easy to check that
will have a directed cycle of length three unless it is acyclic, in which case
. So in this case, the conjecture holds. More generally, it is natural to suspect that a digraph with few non-edges and no directed triangles should be close to acyclic. Indeed, this conjecture asserts a precise relationship of this form.
If true, the above conjecture is essentially tight for a number of examples. We noted above that it is tight for transitive tournaments. Here is another basic class: let be the circulant digraph obtained by placing
vertices in a circle, and adding an edge directed from
to
whenever
is distance
from
in the clockwise order. Such examples may be nested to obtain new ones.
Chudnovsky, Seymour, and Sullivan [CSS] utilized a clever double counting argument to prove that always holds. They also proved their conjecture in the case when
is the union of two cliques, and when
is a circular interval digraph.
Bibliography
*[CSS] M. Chudnovsky, P.D. Seymour, and B. Sullivan, Cycles in dense digraphs.
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.