data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db1ab/db1ab1fb617f7cc6d9f82369a743e93b4ef1369e" alt=""
Packing T-joins
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7406/a740686a9f37bc819e301721ccc21329be32143d" alt="$ c $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35fcf/35fcf4169cd7696922be5a01b1829ad7b236dd19" alt="$ c=1 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f90/65f908f51fd934e5b890cfa42becf26a12505356" alt="$ T $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb6e8/cb6e81cb3c4546768f814261efba1810a651c140" alt="$ k $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f90/65f908f51fd934e5b890cfa42becf26a12505356" alt="$ T $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1aab/f1aab17fe9707458dbd3694f5342291488a8034f" alt="$ (2/3)k-c $"
Definitions: A graft consists of a graph together with a distinguished set
of even cardinality. A
-cut is an edge-cut
of
with the property that
is odd. A
-join is a set
with the property that a vertex of
has odd degree if and only if it is in
. A
-join packing is a set of pairwise disjoint T-joins.
It is an easy fact that every -join and every
-cut intersect in an odd number of elements. It follows easily from this that the maximum size of a
-join packing is always less than or equal to the minimum size of a
-cut. There is a simple example of a graft with
with minimum
-cut size
which contains only
disjoint T-joins. The above conjecture asserts that this is essentially the worst case. DeVos and Seymour [DS] have obtained a partial result toward the above conjecture, proving that every graft with minimum
-cut size
contains a
-join packing of size at least the floor of
.
Definition: We say that a graft is an
-graph if
is
-regular,
, and every
-cut of G has size at least
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcd69/bcd693c5a795841bcae26b13b633d2ebbb1d8e03" alt="$ r $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f90/65f908f51fd934e5b890cfa42becf26a12505356" alt="$ T $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/420a1/420a1500ae20f09446a2a48d249c416a6ab57087" alt="$ r-2 $"
In an -graph, every perfect matching is a
-join, so the above conjecture is true with room to spare for
-graphs which are
-edge-colorable. Indeed, Seymour had earlier conjectured that every
-graph contains
disjoint perfect matchings. This however was disproved by Rizzi [R] who constructed for every
an
-graph in which every two perfect matchings intersect. Rizzi suggested the above problem as a possible fix for Seymour's conjecture. DeVos and Seymour have proved that every
-graph has a
-join packing of size at least the floor of
.
Definition: Let be a graph and let
be the set of vertices of
of odd degree. A
-join of
is defined to be a postman set.
Note that when is the set of vertices of odd degree, a cocycle of
is a
-cut if and only if it has odd size. Rizzi has shown that the following conjecture is equivalent to the above conjecture in the special case when
is odd.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/541ef/541efa369f7310860a919223eb7e17d5fec7c328" alt="$ >2k+1 $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9c1b/c9c1b2d9dac4cdbb33173e481d67e533e58d6c22" alt="$ 2k+1 $"
The Petersen graph (or more generally any non -edge-colorable
-graph) shows that the above conjecture would be false with the weaker assumption that every odd edge-cut has size
. The following conjecture asserts that odd edge-cut size
is enough (for the same conclusion) if we assume in addition that G has no Petersen minor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd566/fd566a155f3aa08e04a0edb41fa0dbd85f4f4e29" alt="$ >2k $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9c1b/c9c1b2d9dac4cdbb33173e481d67e533e58d6c22" alt="$ 2k+1 $"
Gerard Cornuejols [C] has kindly offered $5000 for a solution to this conjecture. However, it will be tough to find a quick proof since this conjecture does imply the 4-color theorem. Robertson, Seymour, Sanders, and Thomas [RSST] have proved the above conjecture for cubic graphs. Conforti and Johnson [CJ] proved it under the added hypothesis that G has no 4-wheel minor.
Bibliography
[CJ] M. Conforti and E.L. Johnson, Two min-max theorems for graphs noncontractible to a four wheel, preprint.
[C] G. Cornuejols, Combinatorial Optimization, packing and covering, SIAM, Philadelphia (2001).
[R] R. Rizzi, Indecomposable r-Graphs and Some Other Counterexamples, J. Graph Theory 32 (1999) 1-15. MathSciNet
[RSST] N. Robertson, D.P. Sanders, P.D. Seymour, and R. Thomas, A New Proof of the Four-Color Theorem, Electron. Res. Announc., Am. Math. Soc. 02, no 1 (1996) 17-25.
[S] P.D. Seymour, Some Unsolved Problems on One-Factorizations of Graphs, in Graph Theory and Related Topics, edited by J.A. Bondy and U.S.R. Murty, Academic Press, New York 1979) 367-368.
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.