data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db1ab/db1ab1fb617f7cc6d9f82369a743e93b4ef1369e" alt=""
Crossing numbers and coloring
We let denote the crossing number of a graph
.
Conjecture Every graph
with
satisfies
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e0f/a4e0f513c2b8f991542dbfb0d0258f0811c0ddbf" alt="$ G $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bbd6/9bbd640f614fe6310687e81599184cecce7c808e" alt="$ \chi(G) \ge t $"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae10a/ae10a9a187f65d56bbd32ce8ef4e00dade820db9" alt="$ cr(G) \ge cr(K_t) $"
This conjecture is an interesting weakening of the disproved Hajos Conjecture which asserted that implies that
contains a subdivision of
.
A minimal counterexample to Albertson's conjecture is critical, with minimum degree . Using this and the crossing lemma, Albertson, Cranston and Fox showed that a minimum counterexample has at most
vertices. They then analyzed small cases to show that the conjecture holds for
. More recently, Barat and Toth [BT] sharpened these arguments to show that the conjecture holds for
.
Bibliography
[BT] J. Barat and G. Toth, Towards the Albertson Conjecture
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.